Doubt in Action: Deconstructing a Real Brief
Critical thinking is the foundation of every innovation we know. It doesn't judge whether you're using a pencil or AI — it gives you an advantage in generating great ideas.
Doubt is the catalyst to critical thinking and the first act of creativity: thinking, and more importantly, thinking differently. That's why Paul Lavoie shunned the idea of a creative department at TAXI. He preferred having a creative company where everyone had permission to think differently in the pursuit of excellence in their respective tasks.
TAXI's mantra: Doubt the Conventional. Create the Exceptional.
Doubt had a clear purpose — to create something exceptional.
Doubt is the operative word. When problem-solving, doubt means to question. Even questioning the question that was given to you. Einstein said that if he had 20 days to solve a problem, he would spend the first 19 days figuring out what the true question actually was.
Unless you doubt convention, you'll keep looking at problems the same way. And the results will show it.
Paul likes the word doubt because it's a vulnerable one. It suggests feelings of uncertainty, hesitation, or a lack of conviction about something. A perfect state of mind to start solving problems. It's fresh. It erases old assumptions. It rejects your first idea — which is usually clichéd and done before.
Doubt is the little voice in your head that says, "What if?" — and pushes you toward solutions that are different. Fresh. Engaging. Exceptional.
Choose your brief. Use one of the following:
- A real brief you're currently working on (ideal)
- A recent brief you've already completed (useful for seeing what you missed)
- This hypothetical brief if you don't have one available:
A regional bank wants to attract younger customers (ages 25–35). They want a campaign that feels "fresh and modern" and communicates that they're "not like the big banks." Budget is modest. Timeline is six weeks.
Print it out or write it at the top of a blank page. Give yourself room to work.
Work through each step in order. Don't skip ahead. The sequence matters.
Step 1 — State the obvious.
Write down what the brief is literally asking for. No interpretation yet. Just what's on the surface. One or two sentences.
Step 2 — List your assumptions.
What is the brief taking for granted? What does it assume about the audience, the problem, the category, or the solution? Write down at least five assumptions. Push past the easy ones.
Step 3 — Interrogate each assumption.
For each assumption you listed, ask: Is this actually true? How do we know? What if the opposite were true? You're not trying to be contrarian — you're trying to find where the brief is leaning on shaky ground.
Step 4 — Find the real problem.
Based on your interrogation, write a single sentence that captures what you now believe the actual problem is. This may look very different from what the brief originally stated. That's the point.
Step 5 — Apply Lavoie's Doubt Prompts.
Prompt AI or your creative partner with these doubt prompts and see where they take you:
- Sacred cows make the best hamburgers. What is deemed sacred in the category — and fuck with it. Suspend those notions entirely.
- Question the assumptions you have about the problem. What if the opposite were true?
- Create a shit show. Reverse-think the problem. What steps would you take to ensure failure? You may find a nugget along the way.
- Relate the problem to something unrelated. This can spark new ideas by drawing parallels between different situations.
- Doubt conventional rules of success. Embrace failure: view failures as learning opportunities. Analyzing what went wrong can provide valuable insights for future attempts.
Step 6 — Name a direction.
If you had to solve this real problem with one idea — one image, one line, one gesture — what would it be? Don't polish it. Just name it. The goal isn't a finished concept. It's a direction.
Step 7 — Reflect on your creative philosophy.
Look at the direction you arrived at. What does it say about how you see the world? What values or beliefs shaped where you ended up? Write two or three sentences connecting your answer back to your own point of view.
Quick Quiz: Is Your Doubt Working?
Before you move on, check your thinking against these questions. Answer honestly — no one's grading you.
1. Did you question the question?
The brief gave you a problem. Did you accept it at face value, or did you interrogate whether it was the right problem to solve?
- A) I worked with the problem as stated.
- B) I pushed on it and found a different — or deeper — problem underneath.
2. Which of Lavoie's Doubt Prompts hit hardest?
Look back at Step 5. One of those five prompts probably cracked something open. Which one — and what did it reveal?
3. Is your direction clichéd?
Ask yourself honestly: have you seen this idea before? If the answer is yes — or even maybe — go back to Step 3. Doubt it again.
4. Did 'No' show up yet?
If you shared your direction with someone and they nodded along without hesitation, that's a warning sign. A direction worth pursuing usually earns at least one raised eyebrow. Did yours?
Use these questions as a gut-check, not a scorecard. The goal is sharper thinking — not a passing grade.
By the end of this exercise, you should have:
- A written record of your assumptions and where they broke down
- A reframed problem statement that goes deeper than the original brief
- A rough creative direction rooted in that reframed problem
- A clearer sense of how your personal creative philosophy influences your thinking
Don't judge the quality of the idea you land on. That's not what this is about. What matters is the quality of the thinking that got you there.
Ok — you have your new idea and you start sharing it. Paul's advice: make 'No' your bitch.
'No' is a silent alarm. If your idea isn't meeting some resistance, you should start to worry. It's your first hint it's docile and predictable. But when 'no' is sounding off like a five-alarm fire, it's your cue that you're on to something great and worthwhile.
Make 'no' part of the creative process and put it to work.
This is what Constructive Doubt looks like in practice — not a flash of inspiration, but a disciplined process of questioning your way to clarity. Do it enough times, and it stops feeling like work. It starts feeling like instinct.
That's the goal.
Note: Paul Lavoie and TAXI wrote a book on Doubt. It goes deeper. Seek it out.
